Peer Reviews

During the peer reviews today the annotated bibliographies were very well done for both Alyssa and Sophie. Both were evenly detailed and with some final edits could be copied and pasted into their final drafts for portions of their essay. Alyssa’s annotated bibliography could have used more substance in the second paragraph of both of her annotations. Her sources were more so summarized in the first paragraph when she gave credibility to the source. In addition she could have added more detail into the final paragraph relating it to the other sources she had because she mainly stated how they were similar not so much how they were different. Within Sophie’s second paragraph on her first annotation she could have added more detain into the summarization of the source. Other than that Sophie’s annotations were difficult to pinpoint something wrong but with the addition of some quotes within her annotations she can improve the quality of the annotations. All in all both the annotations were very well done and taught me a lot about the format mine should be in and the content mine is suppose to contain with the peer reviews I conducted today along with the ones that were done on my annotations, all of our works will come out better for it.

Miles, Jennifer M. "Reflections of Student Government Association Leaders: Implications for

Advisors." College Student Journal, vol. 45, no. 2, June 2011, p. 324. EBSCOhost,

login.proxy.lib.fsu.edu/login?url=http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db

=f5h&AN=61863662&site=eds-live.